ViSalus Files For IPO Of Up To $175 Million

by Ted Nuyten on August 16, 2012

ViSalus IPO

 

Aug 16 (Reuters) – ViSalus Inc, which sells weight management products, filed with U.S. regulators on Thursday to raise up to $175 million in an initial public offering.

The Troy, Michigan-based company told the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission in a preliminary prospectus that it will offer Class A common stock, which will be underwritten by Jefferies. The company, founded in 2005, sells nutritional supplements and energy drinks in the United States through independent distributors.

ViSalus is backed by candle maker Blyth Inc and private equity firm Ropart Investments LLC. ViSalus earned $24.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012 on net sales of $327.3 million.

The company said in the filing that the offering is a part of a series of reorganization transactions that will be consummated before the closing of the offering. The filing did not reveal how many shares the company planned to sell or their expected price. The company also did not disclose the ticker symbol and exchange it planned to list its shares on.

The amount of money a company says it plans to raise in its first IPO filings is used to calculate registration fees. The final size of the IPO could be different.

About an IPO:

An initial public offering (IPO) or stock market launch is a type of public offering where shares of stock in a company are sold to the general public, on a securities exchange, for the first time. Through this process, a private company transforms into a public company. Initial public offerings are used by companies to raise expansion capital, to possibly monetize the investments of early private investors, and to become publicly traded enterprises. A company selling shares is never required to repay the capital to its public investors. After the IPO, when shares trade freely in the open market, money passes between public investors. Although an IPO offers many advantages, there are also significant disadvantages. Chief among these are the costs associated with the process, and the requirement to disclose certain information that could prove helpful to competitors, or create difficulties with vendors. Details of the proposed offering are disclosed to potential purchasers in the form of a lengthy document known as a prospectus. Most companies undertaking an IPO do so with the assistance of an investment banking firm acting in the capacity of an underwriter. Underwriters provide a valuable service, which includes help with correctly assessing the value of shares (share price), and establishing a public market for shares (initial sale). Alernative methods, such as the dutch auction have also been explored. The most notable recent example of this method is the Google IPO.[1] China has recently emerged as a major IPO market, with several of the largest IPO offerings taking place in that country.

ViSalus Co Founders

Facebook Comments

Facebook Comments

10 comments… read them below or add one

Matt Ward August 16, 2012 at 8:19 pm
This is a once in a lifetime opportunity!! So proud of this company and what we are about!

Reply

Louella Abner August 16, 2012 at 8:58 pm
There are pros and cons to becoming a public company. Going public strengthens a company's capital base, makes acquisitions easier, increases access to debt markets and diversifies ownership. Disadvantages include increased pressure on short-term growth, increased costs, increased restrictions on management and trading, disclosure of financial information and original company owners' loss of control in decision making. I hope the owners are bringing their "A" game to the table. www.billsfreewithme.com

Reply

Liliana Couvillon August 16, 2012 at 9:07 pm
Proud to be part of this amazing company, SUCCESS leaves CLUES!

Reply

Taylor Clouse August 16, 2012 at 9:53 pm
Not sure if an IPO is great for distributors in this industry for the long haul. Seems to me it brings in capitol for the company, but often owners lose a lot of control over the direction the company goes. Any thoughts?

Reply

Brock K August 16, 2012 at 10:23 pm
After a couple decades of being involved in the Network Marketing industry I see this as a "kiss of death" of sorts. This is great for Ryan, Blake and Nick, they are going to cash in big time, but potentially devistating for the distributors. Network Marketing companies thrive on the fact that they are "for the distributors" "We" as distributors, reps, ibo's, agents or whatever you call yourself are the life blood of a company we are the ones who bring the customers. When you start taking money from the reps and make it about pleasing the share holders it gets ugly. Look at other MLM's over the years that went public then either failed or became private again. Mary Kay, went public then Mary Kay Ash bought all the share back herself so it could survive. Excel Communications, public then private then sold off to Vartec which then filed Bankruptcy and expelled all of the distributors and sold them to Shaklee. Pre-paid Legal, also public then recently became private again. The biggest of all Avon and they are down over 75%!!! Almost all of this can be attributed to the shift of importance from distributor to share holder. I'm thankful that I work with a company that is 100% debt free, shareholder and investor free. Believe me I've experienced the excitement and the hype of being part of a company that goes public, its a big deal and it's a massive piece of credibility that will initially help your business grow. However history has seen more often than not it doesn't end well for the distributors only for the owners. I wish everyone at ViSalus the very best and I really do hope it plays out well for all of them. But remember now that you're going to be a public company someone OWNS you again.

Reply

Mike Collins August 17, 2012 at 12:18 am
I believe Taylor Clouse and Louella Abner are two of the smarter people commenting here and and not caught up in the "hype" of going public. Louella hit the nail on the head. Shareholders want a return on their investment. It WILL come at someone's expense.

Reply

Alicia Wills August 17, 2012 at 3:00 am
It has been totally amazing experiencing this first hand

Reply

wendy goode August 17, 2012 at 8:01 am
So proud to be part of an amazing company , i definitely would like shares , this is a company that has success all over it . thankyou nick , blake and ryan for making this company what it is today !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply

Reza M August 17, 2012 at 9:49 am
Didnt Lexxus go down the same path?

Reply

Jake Petrykowski August 18, 2012 at 7:24 pm
By law the stockholders best interests will always come before the promoters. Being publicly traded has it's pros and cons.

Reply

Leave a Comment

*